Community for Kel-Tec Shooters banner
1 - 18 of 18 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
382 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Folks,

Has anyone subscribed to or assessed the reviews and comparisons that are found at Gun-Tests?

http://www.gun-tests.com

This site is a subscription service ($2.00 per month) and and offers detailed field test comparisons of various guns. It also allows you to buy a particular review for a one time fee and I reviewed a report that compared the KT-32, P3AT and the Guardian 32NAA. I thought it was a good review format, and their conclusions seemed balanced (overall ranking from best to least was P3AT, P32 and Guardian 32NAA) but since I have experience with only the P3AT can't evaluate their assessment of the other two guns.

They claim to be independent from any gun manufacturer or associated group in terms of sponsorship or affiliation allowing them to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. ;D

I'm thinking about signing up for the annual subscription, but am interested if anyone else here has looked at this material.

Thanks for any input.

Ron..... 8)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
185 Posts
I currently subscribe, and I'm glad I did. These guys have zero advertising, and they seem to write sensible balanced reviews of the weapons. Recommended, especially if you're looking to expand your collection and need quick, affordable reviews.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
382 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Totally agree. I subscribed shortly after posting the initial message on this thread last December. I really enjoy the monthly reviews and I have ordered some of the back reviews as well. Low cost and very informative.

Ron.... 8)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,044 Posts
I recieved thier advertising in the mail, but they gave two reviews on two guns that I own that were not accurate IMHO. I prefer to get reviews from people I know in person and don't charge to give me my opinion :-/ IE: The glock 29 in 10mm will fail to feed and extract and is better off thrown at an attacker..... ??? I am over 5000 rounds in my 29 with Zero malfunctions.....Like I said just my .02....but I'm not charging $2.00 for it ::)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
185 Posts
Drivelane said:
.Like I said just my .02....but I'm not charging $2.00 for it ::)
Point taken. And to further emphasize your point, these are opinions. Theirs. Yours. Mine.

I look at it this way: this appears to be an independent, objective group of guys, albeit small in number, who have some system for testing weapons. And for 20 odd bucks, I can read their opinions. In a year's time, I've found their commentary to be tempered, reasonable. Doesn't mean that what they say is 100% accurate or emotion-free. But for that small chunk of change, I believe I've picked up a good amount of information from 'em.

But, as we all agree...that's just my opinion.


;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,044 Posts
g27_mengi said:
Point taken. And to further emphasize your point, these are opinions. Theirs. Yours. Mine.

I look at it this way: this appears to be an independent, objective group of guys, albeit small in number, who have some system for testing weapons. And for 20 odd bucks, I can read their opinions. In a year's time, I've found their commentary to be tempered, reasonable. Doesn't mean that what they say is 100% accurate or emotion-free. But for that small chunk of change, I believe I've picked up a good amount of information from 'em.

But, as we all agree...that's just my opinion.


;)
This is what makes KTOG such a nice place. I wont call any names, but there are very experienced, unpaid guys here that give that stuff free ;)

Sorry, had to jab after I saw the semper fi 8)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
185 Posts
KTOG: Agreed. Full of experienced helpful people. Probably the friendliest forum I've seen on the web.

Hey, they let former Jarheads like ME in, so that's sayin' something. How you Army guys get in...well...that's defies explanation.

;)

Cheers,
Mengi
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,377 Posts
g27_mengi said:
How you Army guys get in...well...that's defies explanation. ;)
Cheers, Mengi
Hey!
I resemble that there statement!
If it wasn't for the Army, the Marines wouldn't have any foxholes to take a dump in when they get there. ;D


rcmodel
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12 Posts
Ron said:
Folks,

Has anyone subscribed to or assessed the reviews and comparisons that are found at Gun-Tests?

http://www.gun-tests.com

This site is a subscription service ($2.00 per month) and and offers detailed field test comparisons of various guns.  It also allows you to buy a particular review for a one time fee and I reviewed a report that compared the KT-32, P3AT and the Guardian 32NAA.  I thought it was a good review format, and their conclusions seemed balanced (overall ranking from best to least was P3AT, P32 and Guardian 32NAA) but since I have experience with only the P3AT can't evaluate their assessment of the other two guns.

They claim to be independent from any gun manufacturer or associated group in terms of sponsorship or affiliation allowing them to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.  ;D

I'm thinking about signing up for the annual subscription, but am interested if anyone else here has looked at this material.

Thanks for any input.

Ron..... 8)
I was a subscriber for several years and I did get some usefull info from them from time to time. The reason I dropped them is because I found half or more of the reviews were of firearms that I would never buy. Also they only receive one gun to test and as we all know, there can be a lemon they received. I would rather go on the various forums and listen to the people who own these guns and the results of long term use of their weapons. I also found the price much too high for their limited advice.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
60 Posts
SK2344 said:
[quote author=Ron link=1133419978/0#0 date=1133430777]Folks,

Has anyone subscribed to or assessed the reviews and comparisons that are found at Gun-Tests?

http://www.gun-tests.com

... They claim to be independent from any gun manufacturer or associated group in terms of sponsorship or affiliation allowing them to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.  ;D

I'm thinking about signing up for the annual subscription, but am interested if anyone else here has looked at this material.

Thanks for any input.

Ron..... 8)
I was a subscriber for several years and I did get some usefull info from them from time to time. The reason I dropped them is because I found half or more of the reviews were of firearms that I would never buy. Also they only receive one gun to test and as we all know, there can be a lemon they received. I would rather go on the various forums and listen to the people who own these guns and the results of long term use of their weapons. I also found the price much too high for their limited advice.
[/quote]

Yes I agree as well. I subscribed for awhile then dropped it. I was not impressed with the level of knowledge or experience of their reviewers, who seemed to be beginner hobbyists that figured they could make a buck doing claimed "unbiased" reviews. After a few issues their particular biases and lack of expertise became obvious, regardless of whether they accepted advertising. As stated, their reviews are based on one sample, which is skewed. In some of their reviews, their conclusions were completely opposite of mine, and I have almost 25 years of professional experience with firearms and ammunition. I've also hunted quite extensively in North America and Africa and found many of their recommendations to be without merit, and indeed, biased. After one particularly ignorant article on Hornady Light Magnum ammunition, I wrote a letter to them in response. To my surprise, they published it. Guess they figure the reader is the final inspector of their test regimen.

Its a fun read, but use Gun Tests for entertainment purposes only. ;D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
30 Posts
I subscribed about ten years ago. I really liked them for awile. They were fairly new. I found that my findings were not the same as theirs. I got the feeling they were like the comercial news, good news doesn't sell. They had to streach to find things wrong and exploit what they found. My plug for Nutnfancy too. I like his...work?....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5 Posts
g27_mengi said:
KTOG: Agreed. Full of experienced helpful people. Probably the friendliest forum I've seen on the web.

Hey, they let former Jarheads like ME in, so that's sayin' something. How you Army guys get in...well...that's defies explanation.




Cheers,
Mengi
Hey jar head! Your talking to one of the army guys that were FIRST in battle. US Army 1st Signal Brigade, Who do you think it was that was first on the beach to film the jar heads coming off the LST's at Normandy and other conflicts??? ;D

Just raggin on ya buddy. We all did our thing, and should be proud of every bit of it. ;)

Just raggin' on ya buddy ;D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,879 Posts
I subscribed back when they were a published monthly issue. It took me three months to figure out they weren't for me. That's why I never renewed my subscription and why I don't have their website bookmarked today. I'll stick to Nutnfancy and others I've learned to trust.
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top