Competition's good, yes, but to compete with other companies, your product has to offer something that the others do not, or it should be able to do the same things that the others do, only better. Far as I can see from just the stats, the RP45/RP9 is fairly "meh," much like the Ruger American Pistol - not bad, just nothing better than what's already out there. It's not significantly cheaper, lighter, more compact, or anything else. And besides, given Remington's track record as of late with the R51 and RM380, I'd be surprised if there aren't at least some initial quality control/design problems with the RM45/RM9 ... unless, of course, they've finally learned from their (VERY expensive) mistakes.