Joined
·
389 Posts
Although I did not have any issues such as receiver wear, I decided to install a new recoil spring, just to be sure. I ordered the SU16-174 part from Kel-Tec. The number 174 corresponds to the recoil spring in the old parts list, BTW.
So, imagine my surprise when the new spring turned out to be much softer than the old spring. The old spring can easily strip rounds from magazines if I let the charging handle go, but the new one old moves the carrier group half-way before it grinds to a halt.
Note that the new spring has fewer turns. It would've been stronger than the old spring if it were made from the same wire, but apparently it is not. In the picture, the 2009 spring is above and 2016 spring is below.
It is not strange for part specifications to change in 7 years of production. But my problem with this is, I do not believe that such a weak spring is a good enough substitute. Could anyone have a look at their springs and count turns? Please also post what year your gun was made in.
So, imagine my surprise when the new spring turned out to be much softer than the old spring. The old spring can easily strip rounds from magazines if I let the charging handle go, but the new one old moves the carrier group half-way before it grinds to a halt.
Note that the new spring has fewer turns. It would've been stronger than the old spring if it were made from the same wire, but apparently it is not. In the picture, the 2009 spring is above and 2016 spring is below.
It is not strange for part specifications to change in 7 years of production. But my problem with this is, I do not believe that such a weak spring is a good enough substitute. Could anyone have a look at their springs and count turns? Please also post what year your gun was made in.
Attachments
-
43.7 KB Views: 174