adamsesq said:
ZS - I am not convinced that ALL P3AT's end up with that little ridge if you look hard enough. I think the question is does it ever grow large enough to let the spring out?
In other words, I hope we are not screaming "movie" in a crowded fire house [sic] and causing everyone to get out the magnifying glass or straight edge and then thinking what they see is really a problem.
-Scott
Scot makes a valid point here. If the recoil rod has ANY texture from the machining operation it WILL raise metal at the hole and predominately the top of the hole. This is a different issue from the peening problem.
The peening should be a larger raised area and also all the way around the hole. I don't see the "filing" issue as a "problem", more of a F&B issue.
My recoil rod looked and felt smooth to the touch, but when I ran my fingernail along it I could feel the texture. When I looked real close I could see the machining marks from the last pass of the cutting tool. Now why they turn this part on a lathe instead of cold heading it from a piece of rod stock is a whole 'nother question.
Moral of this story is that a few passes lengthwise on the recoil rod with some fine sandpaper is highly recomended on a new recoil rod.
The "filing" action may not be a real problem long term but it does look bad and MAY be mistaken for the "peening" problem which appears to be due to too deep a spring pocket in the slide.