cactus_jack said:
even more so RJ when one puts that pf9 inside a good pocket holseter, you certainly then don't have a "pocket gun". If I have to dress to carry a Pf9 then I will carry something better. I might be totally off base here, but I think kt's nitch is the 380 mini and not the pf9 or p11, there are others out there "almost" as small and that are reliable etc, but no one has come up woth such a good working 380 that weights nothing like kt has. IMO they should strive to make that weapon even better with better quailty control issues, better finish (which they have now started to do). This is a unique weapon that even though there are a few almost as small and maybe even better made and more costly, the kt mini 380 and even the 32 are so unique and simple that Kt just needs to improve on the overall quality and performance of the weapons. I don't think there is a person here who would not pay alittle more to see these weapons coming out of the box right the first time and the materials and workmanship being much better. It can be done, there are machines made that can peform these quality features. We shouldn't bee hearing about crappy barrels, or slide photos as horrendous as we have seen lately. Kt has no market challenge "yet" with their two mini's.. they have plenty of market challenge with the 9's though.rjhauser said:
I couldn't agree more and I for one sure would be willing to pay more for improved quality in the P-3AT.jocko said:
Even though the PF-9 and P11 are too big for most to pocket carry there is demand for the smallest and lightest 9mm to more easily conceal in other locations.jocko said:
