Community for Kel-Tec Shooters banner

1 - 15 of 15 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,879 Posts
It would most likely work. I used to own an LCP that I ut the KT +1 extension on. It worked just fine. I don't see why it wouldn't work if that's what you want to do.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
26 Posts
I have the Kel-Tec extension mag. The hold, room for extra grip, and carry, I can still put it in my pocket, are as good as before
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,567 Posts
Looks bigger than the KT +1 to me, uglier too.

Your P3 may refuse to work properly if you put a part for it's illegitimate child on it. ;)

CJ
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,317 Posts
The Kel-Tec +1 extension includes a new longer spring, the early ones did not and sometimes mis-fed. This one uses the original spring.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
32,086 Posts
CJP32 said:
Looks bigger than the KT +1 to me, uglier too.

Your P3 may refuse to work properly if you put a part for it's illegitimate child on it.  ;)
Agreed. That thing is too big and ugly, and I would not trust it for reliability, especially with a spring designed for the 6 rd mag.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4 Posts
Hello, everyone - I just joined the forum, although I've been following for a couple of months ever since I decided to get a P3AT. I've had one for a few weeks, and being an inveterate tinkerer decided to try the LCP mag extension currently under discussion. In the hope of saving folks some time, effort and money, I think I can report with a considerable degree of confidence that it doesn't work on the P3AT. The issues (I won't say flaws since, after all, it's designed for a different gun) are:

* It's both wider and thicker height-wise than the Kel-Tec version. I could live with the wider part, but the height difference means the mag won't lock into place. That can be dealt with by grinding or sanding down the extension from the top (it's either plastic or nylon), but

* The design is such that there's not way to keep the extension from sliding off the mag. The Kel-Tec baseplate doesn't engage the bottom of the mag when using the LCP extension the way it does with the Kel-Tec extension, which means that while that little button is sticking out of the hole in the bottom of the LCP extension, the baseplate itself is sitting in the bottom of the extension, not higher up where it is if you use the Kel-Tec extension. In other words, the LCP extension is a totally different design that just doesn't work with the P3AT mag. I was mulling over ways to modify it so it would work, but everything I could think of would have taken away the + one round extra capacity, which is kind of the whole point of the extension in the first place. Bottom line, at least as far as I can see - stick with the Kel-Tec extension. It's definitely not as attractive, but at least it works.

Hope this helps.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
32,086 Posts
rke930 said:
 It's definitely not as attractive, but at least it works.
Your opinion - not mine.  I happen to think the LCP extension is clunky and ugly, larger than needed, and likely an unnecessarily increased hinderance to pocket carry.  :p

On the other hand, the Kel-tec version is sleek, utilitarian, functional and attractive. For concealed carry, less is more.  :cool:  


 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4 Posts
TxCajun wrote: Your opinion - not mine. I happen to think the LCP extension is clunky and ugly, larger than needed, and likely an unnecessarily increased hinderance to pocket carry.



Well, yes, just my opinion, and you're certainly entitled to yours. And, since there's no way I can see to make the LCP extension work on a P3AT magazine anyway, I don't know that this is something worth either of us falling on our sword over. So I won't.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
32,086 Posts
Yep, moot point. ;)
 
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Top