Community for Kel-Tec Shooters banner
1 - 20 of 23 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
152 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
It seems that I have seen a bunch of different numbers for the weight of the P3AT. Kel-Tec says that the P3AT weighs 8.3 oz (I know the 1st gen P3s are lighter). I have a gram scale that is rated to be within 1 %. On my scale, my P3AT weighs 256 grams (9.0 oz.) with an empty magazine not 8.3 oz (236 g) which is what Kel-Tec says the P3At weighs. With no magazine, it weighs 7.9 oz. Fully loaded with 7 rounds of Buffalo Bore Gold Dots it weighs 11.3 oz. The empty magazine weighs 1.1 oz. In any event, none of these weights correspond to 8.3 oz. I really don't think that the scale is wrong. I've tried weighing things of known weight and the scale is on. I think the the P3AT weight is closer to the Ruger LCP weight (9.4 oz.) than the factory numbers lead us to believe. (Actually, this makes sense since the LCP is essentially a direct copy of the P3 except for the slide stop.) Don't get me wrong...I'm not knocking the P3AT. I love the gun. It's fun to shoot and amazingly accurate for such a short barrel. Also, I really don't know why people need recoil pads and slip-ons etc. for this gun. I think that the P3 recoil is a little "brisk" but not at all unpleasant even with the BB +P rounds. Have any of you weighed your 2nd gen P3ATs and if so, what did you come up with? Once again, I'm not complaining! I think that 11.3 oz fully loaded is great. It's my primary carry gun now that it's hot in Arizona.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
186 Posts
gvaldeg1 said:
It seems that I have seen a bunch of different numbers for the weight of the P3AT. Kel-Tec says that the P3AT weighs 8.3 oz (I know the 1st gen P3s are lighter). I have a gram scale that is rated to be within 1 %. On my scale, my P3AT weighs 256 grams (9.0 oz.) with an empty magazine not 8.3 oz (236 g) which is what Kel-Tec says the P3At weighs. With no magazine, it weighs 7.9 oz. Fully loaded with 7 rounds of Buffalo Bore Gold Dots it weighs 11.3 oz. The empty magazine weighs 1.1 oz. In any event, none of these weights correspond to 8.3 oz. I really don't think that the scale is wrong. I've tried weighing things of known weight and the scale is on. I think the the P3AT weight is closer to the Ruger LCP weight (9.4 oz.) than the factory numbers lead us to believe. (Actually, this makes sense since the LCP is essentially a direct copy of the P3 except for the slide stop.) Don't get me wrong...I'm not knocking the P3AT. I love the gun. It's fun to shoot and amazingly accurate for such a short barrel. Also, I really don't know why people need recoil pads and slip-ons etc. for this gun. I think that the P3 recoil is a little "brisk" but not at all unpleasant even with the BB +P rounds. Have any of you weighed your 2nd gen P3ATs and if so, what did you come up with? Once again, I'm not complaining! I think that 11.3 oz fully loaded is great. It's my primary carry gun now that it's hot in Arizona.
It wouldn't be a surprise if Kt made a 'mistake' on the weight of the P3AT, they made the same 'mistake' on OAL lengh of the P11 which was never reported until the PF9 came out.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
41 Posts
gvaldeg1 said:
It seems that I have seen a bunch of different numbers for the weight of the P3AT.  Kel-Tec says that the P3AT weighs 8.3 oz (I know the 1st gen P3s are lighter).  I have a gram scale that is rated to be within 1 %.  On my scale, my P3AT weighs 256 grams (9.0 oz.) with an empty magazine not 8.3 oz (236 g) which is what Kel-Tec says the P3At weighs.  With no magazine, it weighs 7.9 oz.  Fully loaded with 7 rounds of Buffalo Bore Gold Dots it weighs 11.3 oz.  The empty magazine weighs 1.1 oz.  In any event, none of these weights correspond to 8.3 oz.  I really don't think that the scale is wrong.  I've tried weighing things of known weight and the scale is on.  I think the the P3AT weight is closer to the Ruger LCP weight (9.4 oz.) than the factory numbers lead us to believe.  (Actually, this makes sense since the LCP is essentially a direct copy of the P3 except for the slide stop.)  Don't get me wrong...I'm not knocking the P3AT.  I love the gun.  It's fun to shoot and amazingly accurate for such a short barrel.  Also, I really don't know why people need recoil pads and slip-ons etc. for this gun.  I think that the P3 recoil is a little "brisk" but not at all unpleasant even with the BB +P rounds.  Have any of you weighed your 2nd gen P3ATs and if so, what did you come up with?  Once again, I'm not complaining!  I think that 11.3 oz fully loaded is great.  It's my primary carry gun now that it's hot in Arizona.
I would have to say "it is what it is". I carry a P3AT in my front pocket and don't even notice it's there, (most of the time).
 
G

·
If you do a detailed fluff and buff, trim a bit off the bottom of the trigger, sand out the seams, trim out the overflash, remove every third line of checkering on the grip, use LIGHT WEIGHT OIL, and make sure you keep the pocket lint out of it.. I bet you could reduce over all weight by at least 2.4743 grams. :-/
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,201 Posts
8.3 oz. Empty no magazine, w pocket clip and metal mag catch and Sprinter pads and grip sleeve and a tiny bit of luminescent paint on the sights, heavily coated with lube and grease. Magazines w ammo are so varied they don't matter much. But then I could be making all this up since I don't have any weapons any more.

-Scott
 
G

·
adamsesq said:
8.3 oz. .... a tiny bit of luminescent paint on the sights, ...

-Scott

DANG-- I forget about the paint! No wonder mine weighs so much!


Mitch... shuffling off to the wifes medicine cabinet to get her rubbing alcohol to rub off those heavy sights!








gvaldeg1...... Just messing with ya a bit....I hope you know it is really late for me to be up this late trying to be funny......but it was a long day and I needed to unwind.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
159 Posts
Thanks for posting some actually measured weights of the different parts. Whatever the P3 weight, it's pretty comfortable in the pocket. Before I bought mine, I carried an 11 oz bag of quarters in my pocket to see what it would be like. Then I did the same with a bigger bag of quarters equivalent to the NAA Guardian .380. What a difference!! It convinced me that the Kel-Tec was the only choice. (That was pre-copycat from Ruger.)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
840 Posts
alot of companies out there don't have the correct listings on weight...i weighed my kel-tecs and chater arms on wifey's food scale and all were wrong.....i tend to believe her scale because she is looking awful good these days..but i guess not all scales are created equal..... :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
214 Posts
really! i thought HC was just a surface treatment - couldnt imagine it would make a measurable difference on weight. anyway, since my numbers are basically identical to the starter of the thread, i bet he too has a HC piece.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,201 Posts
joje said:
really! i thought HC was just a surface treatment - couldnt imagine it would make a measurable difference on weight. anyway, since my numbers are basically identical to the starter of the thread, i bet he too has a HC piece.
HC is a plating so it is going to add something. I think Sprinter at one time said ".006" Since we are measuring to 1/100th of an ounce or grams :) that is pretty drastic!

-Scott
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
214 Posts
anyone have a blued p3at and a scale? i'd like to know just out of curiousity. did a back-of-the-envelope calculation and it seems like the hard chrome could actually make as much as 10-20 grams of difference
 
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top